Why are companies reconsidering remote and hybrid working models after the post-pandemic period?
In an opinion piece for RH Magazine, Carolina Hecker, Associate in the Labour practice at CCA Law Firm, reflects on how the recent transformations in the teleworking framework have driven a gradual return to face-to-face work and fostered the implementation of hybrid models.
This trend seems to be intrinsically linked to the legal obligations stipulated in Article 168 Labour Code, which requires full compensation for the additional expenses associated with teleworking. The lack of distinction in the applicability of teleworking arrangements and the tax implications of this compensation present significant challenges for companies, leading them to reconsider the viability of these schemes.
‘This financial obligation (even though it may translate into marginal amounts) may be a factor that leads many companies to reconsider the viability of applying the teleworking framework in their structures and, consequently, to determine whether to return to face-to-face work or to apply hybrid models that minimise these costs,’ explains the lawyer.